budzos
Member Profile
Member Since: 2006-10-30
Last Power Points used: 2008-07-10 • Available: now
Max Power Points: 1
Comments
In reply to this comment by budzos:
In reply to this comment by bcglorf:
In reply to this comment by budzos:
Wish I could upvote ten times for enforcing precision of speech. Can't stand when people don't think about the precise meaning of their words. So I pretty much can't stand most people, most of the time.


I can't tell if your talking about Galloway or the other guy? At first you seem to be praising Galloway for enforcing clear speech, but Galloway is the one dropping the context of the speech since Ahminedjad must pause immediately after the line to wait for the cheers of "Death to Israel".


I'm talking about Galloway. We're talking about precision of speech, not taking all things into context.


But then Galloway is the one being imprecise because whatever specific grammar Ahminedjad may have used, the entire crowd he was speaking to clearly understood him to be referring to Israel. More over, he smiles approvingly at the calls for "Death to Israel" that follow. In that light, I think the context is much more important than the precise choice of words.


written by bcglorf  | 1 week 6 days ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
In reply to this comment by budzos:
Wish I could upvote ten times for enforcing precision of speech. Can't stand when people don't think about the precise meaning of their words. So I pretty much can't stand most people, most of the time.

My biggest pet peeve in this regard is someone who makes a clear error in grammar, context, or quoting, who then says when corrected "Well this is how I use it and grammar evolves according to usage." Literal-mindedness combined with ignorance: the marketing victim mentality.



I can't tell if your talking about Galloway or the other guy? At first you seem to be praising Galloway for enforcing clear speech, but Galloway is the one dropping the context of the speech since Ahminedjad must pause immediately after the line to wait for the cheers of "Death to Israel".


written by bcglorf  | 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
It's YouDieJoe's 250 Party!


written by Zonbie  | 2 weeks 2 days ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
The cannadian cops I was referencing were in this. Although you never really see the suspect die, he does die of heart failure. He only speaks polish, and the Canadians tase him for not being able to comply with their commands.

In reply to this comment by budzos:
The concept of a Canadian cop overreacting extremely harshly to words is not lost on me. I know why police are necessary but I can't fucking stand to be around them. For the most part they really are power-tripping assholes.


written by NordlichReiter  | 4 weeks 1 day ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Hey, sweet link! Now all I need to do is build a MAME box and I'm good to go. One day... [thumbs]

In reply to this comment by budzos:
You should visit this site:

http://arcade.hofle.com/

The torrents don't work so great, try mirrors 2 or 3 for any of the downloads. I sometimes play this through my HT receiver in Dolby Pro Logic mode, which does a nice job of surrounding me in arcade ambiance.

In reply to this comment by videosiftbannedme:
Ah, that noise....you know, all the attract modes playing at once. I miss that ambient noise.



written by videosiftbannedme  | 2 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
You should set up some playlists for your G4 posts. http://www.videosift.com/talk/How-to-create-a-Custom-Player-in-YouTube


written by theaceofclubz  | 2 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
In reply to this comment by budzos:
Buddy, if your point is "people have differences which are the cause of conflict", then you have no point at all. My point is simply that atheists don't exist as a group in the same way that people of common religious affiliations exist as groups. Therefore, atheists have never ganged up and killed en masse in the name of atheism.

Yeah, Christians were persecuted by Romans. Last I checked, the ancient Romans were not atheists.


My point is that calling religion the cause of historical conflicts and atrocities is as ridiculous as blaming atheism. The real world is extremely complicated and explaining disasters like genocide as being done "in the name of God" is more ridiculous than talking about atheists as a group.


written by bcglorf  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
In reply to this comment by budzos:
Get it through your head. Atheists are not a group any more than people who dislike peanut butter are a group. That's why they are "insignificant." There is no "they" there.

Like Dawkins says, everyone is an atheist, it's just Christians have a hard time when people take it one god further.


Grouping people's common attributes is really all one can do, be it peanut butter preferences or philosophical beliefs. Look at how many people in history with a common dislike of peanut butter got together to kill peanut butter lovers. None. Then look at how many people in history with a common disbelief in god have gotten together to kill those who did, and vice versa.

My point has repeatedly been that religion or lack there of has not been the root cause of violence in history, but intolerance of different beliefs has been. Whether it is a common belief there is a god, or a common belief that there isn't, both have been abused by bad people in history to breed intolerance and kill other people.


written by bcglorf  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Indiana Jones appears to die, but because he drank from the Holy Grail in Last Crusade, he comes back to life. Just FYI. Oh, I think that was a spoiler.

In reply to this comment by budzos:
Classy as always.

In reply to this comment by blankfist:
After the game, the losing team raped her.



written by blankfist  | 3 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
that makes me giggle.

In reply to this comment by budzos:
I remember a funny cartoon in my university newspaper about this song... it ended with naked Alanis thanking random things.. "Thank you bagels, thank you monkeys." I remember getting a big LOL out of it at the time.


written by blahpook  | 3 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Hey man! Nice attempt!

In reply to this comment by budzos:
Let's see, it's Saturday night, try to prove my nerdiness... in order of appearance:

Cyclops, Storm, Prof. X, Blob, Cable, Gambit, Mr Sinister, Acolytes, Wolverine, Jean Grey, Rogue, Sentinel, Captain America, Jubilee, Beast, Colossus, Senator Gyrich, Red Skull, Iceman, Magneto, Callisto and the Morlocks, Caliban, Mojo, Leech, Havok, Omega Red, Bishop, Hmmm and starting with the pink hair guy there are a couple characters I don't remember.



written by K0MMIE  | 4 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I didn't ask for your vagina monologue.

In reply to this comment by budzos:
Welcome to my growing list of shitheads. I get really absorbed in movies and so the reason I haven't seen it yet is I was waiting for the right night when I could get properly absorbed in something a little smarter. I'm busy so those times are rare. Someone with Kubrick as their avatar should have more respect for that concept. So go fuck yourself, please.

In reply to this comment by blankfist:
You're welcome. The movie has been out for six months. I'm sure you'd be upset if someone ruined the end to Citizen Kane, too.

In reply to this comment by budzos:
Thanks dickhead.

In reply to this comment by blankfist:
Can anyone explain how Clayton knew the Counsel for UNorth was behind his assassination attempt? And also that was a spoiler, just FYI.



written by blankfist  | 4 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
You're welcome. The movie has been out for six months. I'm sure you'd be upset if someone ruined the end to Citizen Kane, too.

In reply to this comment by budzos:
Thanks dickhead.

In reply to this comment by blankfist:
Can anyone explain how Clayton knew the Counsel for UNorth was behind his assassination attempt? And also that was a spoiler, just FYI.



written by blankfist  | 4 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Cool. No worries. It's hard to read subtext with online typed messages.

In reply to this comment by budzos:
Yes, but in a friendly way. I have posted stupid clips of young idiots playing with Movie Maker too:
http://www.videosift.com/video/Really-Annoying-Guy-Is-Funny-For-Some-Reason


In reply to this comment by blankfist:
I'm sorry, are you calling me a jerkoff for posting this?

In reply to this comment by budzos:
OMFG I want to punch the kid in the face, with his stupid blase delivery. Way to post the result of some fifteen year-old's first experiment with Windows Movie Maker, jerkoff.



written by blankfist  | 6 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Hello!!!! Obi didn't kill Boba's dad, Mace Windu sliced off his head a little while after Jango set his cape on fire. If George Lucas read this he would faint, wait that would be good........ No more minute errors!

In reply to this comment by budzos:
I think you're right Sylvester. Episode 1 has the best use of sabers. The opening twenty minutes of this movie is also quite good, especially the very opening on the trade federation ship. The suckage starts with Jar Jar's first appearance, but the Gungan city and the Jedi's passage through the underwater core of Naboo are some classic Star Wars if you ask me. Things get truly shitty once Anakin shows up.

One thing I hate about the prequels is how every single character who shows up in eps 4-6 is somehow tied to the events of eps 1-3... worst offences being:
1. Darth Vader created C3PO
2. Yoda knows Chewbacca
3. Obi-Wan killed Boba Fett's dad



written by Vajeeh  | 6 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment
log in or register to submit new comment